Keep Pornography a Private Affair and Out of the Public’s View
Pornography has been at the center of many debates for some time. Many law makers have a hard time defining exactly what pornography is. All the while, pornography producers use the First Amendment to their advantage, hiding behind it so they can continue to create pornography. The Susan Brownmiller’s essay “Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet” is the debate between the First Amendment and pornography. Her essay also brings up points regarding pornography that is degrading to women and how some consider educational material to be pornographic. I agree, at least, to keep pornography in the privacy of a person’s own bedroom.
There are also debates between what is obscene and what is used for educational purposes. Brownmiller believes that “…explicit sexual material has its place in literature, art, science and education” (59). Where literature broadens the mind with its descriptions and illustrations that words paint of the human body, art exposes children to what the human body looks like and satisfies their curiosity. Art also gives children a sense of appreciation for the human body and helps them become comfortable in their own skin. However, science educates us on how the human body works. Science shows us the actions and reactions of the body and how it relates to other bodies. If not for education of the human body, how it works and what it looks like would still be a mystery to most. We would be in a sorry state of confusion without the answers to those questions.
The effects on children exposed to pornography are also a concern. Obscenity laws should be put in place to protect the innocent from being exposed to pornography. When small children are exposed to pornography, often parents end up having to answer questions that they would have preferred to answer at a later date when that child is more mature and able to understand, not only the act of sex itself, but also the consequences of the act. Children who witness pornography’s “hatred of women” (59) and its determination to “humiliate, degrade and dehumanize the female body for the purpose of erotic stimulation and pleasure,” (59) according to Brownmiller, view this as normal and acceptable behavior. Early viewing of pornography can lead to experimenting prematurely, as well as teenage pregnancies. Sex crimes and their victims become more common as a result of this mistaken sense of acceptable behavior. Victims of sex crimes may also be unprotected from pornographic material that was similar in nature to their own traumatic experience, therefore, causing a relapse in their own recovery.
Brownmiller insists that “[t]o buy a paper at the corner newsstand is to subject oneself to a forcible immersion in pornography, to be demeaned by an array of dehumanized, chopped-up parts of the female anatomy, packaged like cuts of meat at the supermarket” (59). Skin graces our magazines, book covers and TV more than ever, and mostly its women showing the skin. Society has no choice but to look; it is practically thrown in our faces. As long as society views women simply as skin and a sexual object then that’s how our children are preserving women. Simply “Eye Candy” to be ogled and stripped bare before “hello” can exit her mouth. Women, as a whole, are becoming more educated and less respected because of all the dehumanizing that is geared towards them.
The First Amendment will continue to protect the pornography industry until obscenity laws are passed. Brownmiller does remind us that “[t]here are restraints against false and misleading advertising or statements… that do not threaten, but strengthen our societal values” (60). One day, hopefully, there will be a law that restricts pornography and defines obscenity. Sex is an adult activity and should be kept as such. Keep pornography in the bedroom and out of daily entertainment, advertisements, off the coffee tables and out of the DVD players.
Works Cited
Brownmiller, Susan. “Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. 9th ed. Eds. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2011. 57-60. Print.